Myelodysplasia-related Changes Research Articles

What is new in acute myeloid leukemia classification?

Recently, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification (WHO2022) introduced diagnostically similar yet distinct approaches, which has resulted in practical confusion. This review compares these classification systems for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), building up on the revised 4th edition of WHO (WHO2016). Both classifications retain recurrent genetic abnormalities as a primary consideration. However, they differ in terms of blast threshold. The ICC mandates a minimum of 10% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood, whereas the WHO2022 does not specify a blast cut-off. AML with BCR::ABL1 requires > 20% blast count in both classifications. In WHO2022, AML with CEBPA mutation requires > 20% blasts. TP53 mutation, a new entity is exclusive to ICC, diagnosed with > 20% blasts and variant allele frequency > 10%. AML with myelodysplasia-related changes is defined by cytogenetic or gene mutation-based criteria, not morphological dysplasia. Eight genes were common to both groups: ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2. An additional gene, RUNX1, was included in the ICC classification. AML cases defined by differentiation (WHO2022) and AML not otherwise specified (ICC) are categorized as lacking specific defining genetic abnormalities, WHO2022 labels this as a myeloid neoplasm post cytotoxic therapy (MN-pCT), described as an appendix after specific diagnosis. Similarly, in ICC, it can be described as "therapy-related", without a separate AML category.

[Survival and Prognosis of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes Transformed from Myelodysplastic Syndrome].

To explore the risk factors affecting the survival and efficacy of patients with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) transformed from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The clinical data of 60 patients with AML-MRC transformed from MDS who hospitalized in The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2010 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic data and laboratory parameters, cytogenetic karyotypes, target genes of AML detected by next generation sequence, risk stratification, treatment regimen, therapeutic efficacy and survival outcome were documented. Rank sum test and Chi-square test or Fisher exact test were used to compare the survival and efficacy. The effects of clinical parameters, risk stratification and treatment regimens on the survival and efficacy of the AML-MRC patients were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The median overall survival (OS) of the AML-MRC patients was 4.5 months, the 1-year OS rate was 28.3%, and the complete remission (CR) rate after treatment was 33.3%. The univariate analysis showed that age≥60 years, leukocytosis, severe thrombocytopenia, poor-risk group and only accepted hypomethylating agents(HMAs) or supportive therapy were the risk factors affecting OS. COX multivariate analysis showed that thrombocytopenia ( HR=4.46), HMAs therapy (compared to transplantation, HR=10.47), supportive therapy (compared to transplantation, HR=25.80) and poor-risk group (compared to medium-risk group, HR=13.86) were independent hazard factors for median OS of patients with AML-MRC. The univariate analysis showed that the risk factors affecting 1-year OS in patients with AML-MRC were age≥60 years, thrombocytopenia, time of transformation from MDS to AML (TTA)≥3 months, fibrinogen-albumin ratio index (FARI)≥0.07, CONUT score≥5, poor-risk group and supportive therapy. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factors for 1-year OS in AML-MRC patients were age≥60 years ( HR=11.23), thrombocytopenia ( HR=8.71), FARI≥0.07 ( HR=5.19) and poor-risk group ( HR=14.00). The risk factors affecting CR of AML-MRC patients in univariate analysis were age≥60 years, thrombocytopenia, FARI≥0.1, CONUT score≥5, poor-risk group and supportive therapy, while binary logistic regression analysis showed that age≥60 years( HR=7.35), CONUT score≥5 ( HR=9.60), thrombocytopenia ( HR=12.05) and poor-risk group ( HR=32.5) were independent risk factors affecting CR of the patients. The OS of AML-MRC patients is poor, old age(≥60 years old), supportive therapy, HMA therapy, poor-risk, thrombocytopenia, FARI≥0.07 and CONUT score≥5 may be associated with poor prognosis.

A phase 1/2 study of NS-87/CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin liposome) in Japanese patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

NS-87/CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin. NS-87/CPX-351 exerts antileukemic action by maintaining a synergistic molar ratio of cytarabine to daunorubicin of 5:1 within the liposome while in circulation. Patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which includes therapy-related AML and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), have poorer outcomes than those with other AML. This open-label phase 1/2 (P1/2) study was conducted in 47 Japanese patients aged 60-75years with newly diagnosed high-risk AML to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of NS-87/CPX-351. In the 6 patients enrolled in the P1 portion, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported, and 100units/m2 during the induction cycle was found to be acceptable. Cytarabine and daunorubicin had a long half-life in the terminal phase (32.8 and 28.7h, respectively). In the 35 patients enrolled in the P2 portion, composite complete remission (CRc; defined as complete remission [CR] or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) was achieved in 60.0% (90% CI: 44.7-74.0) of the patients. Adverse events due to NS-87/CPX-351 were well tolerated. NS-87/CPX-351 can be considered as a frontline treatment option for Japanese patients with high-risk AML.

[Clinical and prognostic characteristics of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes under different diagnostic criteria].

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and prognostic differences in acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) children under different diagnostic criteria (World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 and WHO 2022 criteria). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, clinical characteristics and prognosis information of 260 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) children admitted to Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from August 2017 to August 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. According to WHO 2016 and WHO 2022 diagnostic criteria, patients were divided into AML-MRC group and non-AML-MRC group, the prognostic and genetic differences between two groups were compared respectively. Meanwhile, the characteristics of children with 8 MRC-related genes defined in WHO 2022 diagnostic criteria were described. Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test were used for comparison between groups. Survival curve was plotted by Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison between groups was performed by Log-Rank method. Results: Among the 260 children, there were 148 males and 112 females. The follow-up time was 26 (16, 38) months. A total of 28 children (10.8%) were diagnosed with AML-MRC according to the WHO 2016 diagnostic criteria. Compared with non-AML-MRC children, the frequency of PTPN11, RUNX11, SH2B3, MPL and STAG2 mutations was higher in AML-MRC children (25.0% (7/28) vs.4.3% (10/232), 14.3% (4/28) vs.3.9% (9/232), 10.7% (3/28) vs.2.2% (5/232), 10.7% (3/28) vs.2.2% (5/232), 10.7% (3/28) vs.0.9% (2/232), all P<0.05). The 2-year overall survival (OS) and events free survival (EFS) rate of 28 AML-MRC children under WHO 2016 diagnostic criteria were worse than those of 232 non-AML-MRC children ((62.1±10.8)% vs. (94.5±1.6)%, χ2=22.1,P<0.001;(48.0±10.6)% vs. (70.9±3.2)%, χ2=6.33,P=0.012). Twenty-seven children (10.4%) were eventually diagnosed with AML-MRC according to WHO 2022 criteria, their 2-year OS rate were worse than 233 non-AML-MRC children ((60.8±11.1)% vs. (94.5±1.6)%, χ2=24.49,P<0.001), and there was no statistically significant difference in EFS rate between two groups at 2 years ((55.1±10.8)% vs. (70.1±3.2)%, χ2=2.44, P=0.119). Conclusions: Compared with the 2022 WHO diagnostic criteria, the survival rates of children with AML-MRC under the 2016 WHO diagnostic criteria were worse than that of children without MRC.The new version of the AML-MRC diagnostic criteria emphasizes the importance of genes.

Mapping AML heterogeneity - multi-cohort transcriptomic analysis identifies novel clusters and divergent ex-vivo drug responses.

Subtyping of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is predominantly based on recurrent genetic abnormalities, but recent literature indicates that transcriptomic phenotyping holds immense potential to further refine AML classification. Here we integrated five AML transcriptomic datasets with corresponding genetic information to provide an overview (n = 1224) of the transcriptomic AML landscape. Consensus clustering identified 17 robust patient clusters which improved identification of CEBPA-mutated patients with favourable outcomes, and uncovered transcriptomic subtypes for KMT2A rearrangements (2), NPM1 mutations (5), and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) (5). Transcriptomic subtypes of KMT2A, NPM1 and AML-MRC showed distinct mutational profiles, cell type differentiation arrests and immune properties, suggesting differences in underlying disease biology. Moreover, our transcriptomic clusters show differences in ex-vivo drug responses, even when corrected for differentiation arrest and superiorly capture differences in drug response compared to genetic classification. In conclusion, our findings underscore the importance of transcriptomics in AML subtyping and offer a basis for future research and personalised treatment strategies. Our transcriptomic compendium is publicly available and we supply an R package to project clusters to new transcriptomic studies.

Decitabine-containing conditioning improved outcomes for children with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a rare clonal hematopoietic disorder in children. The risk stratification system and treatment strategy for adults are unfit for children. The role of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in higher-risk childhood MDS has not been identified. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children with higher-risk MDS at one single center. A retrospective study was conducted in children with higher-risk MDS undergoing HSCT between September 2019 and March 2023 at Blood Diseases Hospital CAMS. The clinical characteristics and transplantation information were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 27 patients were analyzed, including 11 with MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB), 14 with MDS-EB in transformation (MDS-EBt) or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), and 2 with therapy-related MDS/AML (t-MDS/AML). Eight patients harbored monosomy 7. Before transplantation, induction therapy was administered to 25 patients, and 19 of them achieved bone marrow blasts <5% before HSCT. The stem cell source was unmanipulated-related bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells for nineteen patients and unrelated cord blood for eight. All patients received decitabine-containing and Bu/Cy-based myeloablative conditioning; 26 patients achieved initial engraftment. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) at 100 days were 65.4% and 42.3%, respectively. The incidence of cGvHD was 38.5%. The median follow-up was 26 (range 4-49) months after transplantation. By the end of follow-up, two patients died of complications and two died of disease progression. The probability of 3-year overall survival (OS) was 84.8% (95%CI, 71.1 to 98.5%). In summary, decitabine-containing myeloablative conditioning resulted in excellent outcomes for children with higher-risk MDS undergoing allogeneic HSCT.

A real-world analysis of clinical outcomes in AML with myelodysplasia-related changes: a comparison of ICC and WHO-HAEM5 criteria

AbstractThe proposed fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HAEM5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) provide different definitions of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related genetics (AML-MR). We conducted a retrospective study which included a cohort of 432 patients, with 354 patients fulfilling WHO-HAEM5 criteria for WHO-AML-MR or 276 patients fulfilling ICC criteria for ICC-AML-MR by gene mutation or cytogenetics (ICC-AML-MR-M/CG). The clinicopathological features were largely similar, irrespective of the classification used, except for higher rates of complex karyotype, monosomy 17, TP53 mutations, and fewer RUNX1 mutations in the WHO-AML-MR group. TP53 mutations were associated with distinct clinicopathological features and dismal outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 2.98; P < .001). ICC-AML-MR-M/CG group had superior outcome compared with the WHO-AML-MR group (HR, 0.80, P = .032), largely in part due to defining TP53 mutated AML as a standalone entity. In the intensively-treated group, WHO-AML-MR had significantly worse outcomes than AML by differentiation (HR, 1.97; P = .024). Based on ICC criteria, ICC-AML-MR-M/CG had more inferior outcomes compared to AML not otherwise specified (HR, 2.11; P = .048 and HR, 2.55; P = .028; respectively). Furthermore, changing the order of genetic abnormalities defining AML-MR (ie, by gene mutations or cytogenetics) did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. ICC-AML-MR-M/CG showed similar outcomes regardless of the order of assignment. We propose to harmonize the 2 classifications by excluding TP53 mutations from WHO-HAEM5 defined AML-MR group and combining AML-MR defined by gene mutations and cytogenetics to form a unified group.

CPX-351 exploits the gut microbiota to promote mucosal barrier function, colonization resistance, and immune homeostasis

AbstractCPX-351, a liposomal combination of cytarabine plus daunorubicin, has been approved for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, because it improves survival and outcome of patients who received hematopoietic stem cell transplant compared with the continuous infusion of cytarabine plus daunorubicin (referred to as “7 + 3” combination). Because gut dysbiosis occurring in patients with AML during induction chemotherapy heavily affects the subsequent phases of therapy, we have assessed whether the superior activity of CPX-351 vs “7 + 3” combination in the real-life setting implicates an action on and by the intestinal microbiota. To this purpose, we have evaluated the impact of CPX-351 and “7 + 3” combination on mucosal barrier function, gut microbial composition and function, and antifungal colonization resistance in preclinical models of intestinal damage in vitro and in vivo and fecal microbiota transplantation. We found that CPX-351, at variance with “7 + 3” combination, protected from gut dysbiosis, mucosal damage, and gut morbidity while increasing antifungal resistance. Mechanistically, the protective effect of CPX-351 occurred through pathways involving both the host and the intestinal microbiota, namely via the activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor–interleukin-22 (IL-22)–IL-10 host pathway and the production of immunomodulatory metabolites by anaerobes. This study reveals how the gut microbiota may contribute to the good safety profile, with a low infection-related mortality, of CPX-351 and highlights how a better understanding of the host-microbiota dialogue may contribute to pave the way for precision medicine in AML.

Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia Related Changes (AML-MRC) Receiving Intensive Vs. Non-Intensive First Line Treatment

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes (AML-MRC) a distinct clinico-pathologic subtype of AML recognized in the WHO and ICC 2022 classifications of hematolymphoid neoplasms (AML-MRC and AML-MR respectively). Compared to other subtypes, patients with AML-MRC/AML-MR have a worse prognosis and are less likely to respond to treatment. Traditionally, patients who are eligible for allogenic stem cell transplant (SCT) with AML-MRC/AML-MR are given high intensity chemotherapy (IC), such as daunorubicin and cytarabine (“7+3”), liposomal 7+3 or fludarabine+cytarabine+idarubicin (FLAG-IDA) whereas patients who are not transplant-eligible were treated with hypomethylating agents (i.e. azacitidine). Recently, azacitidine + venetoclax (aza/ven) has emerged as an important option for all AML patients over 75 years of age or with significant comorbidities who are not eligible for IC. However, the efficacy of aza/ven compared to IC for AML-MRC who are candidates for either has not been clearly established. Methodology: We conducted a single centre retrospective review of patients diagnosed with AML-MRC/AML-MR at Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (SHSC). A list of patients with AML-MRC/AML-MR was compiled from records from the Sunnybrook Hematology Biobank, which collects specimens and clinical data from 95% of acute leukemia patients presenting to SHSC. 65 patient charts were reviewed, and 60 patients were included in the study. 3 patients were not treated at SHSC and 2 were more appropriately classified as AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities. Treatment with a “7+3” backbone or FLAG-IDA were considered ‘intensive’ regimens; treatment with azacitidine with or without venetoclax, and low dose cytarabine (LDAC), with or without venetoclax were considered ‘non-intensive.‘ ELN 2022 criteria were used to evaluate responses to therapy. Results: 60 patients with AML-MRC/AML-MR were treated at SHSC from January 2021 to April 2023. The median age was 74 (37-99) y.o. 34 patients were male. The upper age of eligibility for allogeneic stem cell transplant was considered 72 years for this study. 28 patients were SCT eligible (31-72y.o.) and 32 patients were SCT ineligible (73-99y.o.). For SCT eligible patients, 14/28 were treated intensively and 10/28 were treated non intensively. 4 patients did not receive treatment. Of the SCT eligible group, 6/14 intensively treated patients achieved a CR/CRi compared to 5/10 non-intensively treated patients. For SCT ineligible patients, 8/32 did not receive treatment and the remaining 24 were treated non intensively. 12/24 SCT ineligible patients receiving treatment were given azacitidine+ venetoclax (aza/ven) and 9/12 achieved a CR/CRi. 7/24 patients received LDAC + venetoclax and 3/7 achieved a CR. In total, 14/60 patients were treated intensively, 21/60 patients were treated with aza/ven, 7/60 received LDAC+venetoclax, 5/60 azacitidine alone and 1/60 LDAC alone. 12/60 patients did not receive leukemia-directed therapy, either due to concomitant illness precluding treatment or a decision to decline treatment. Notably, 14/21 patients receiving aza/ven achieved a CR/CRi compared to 6/14 intensively treated patients, though more intensively treated patients ultimately proceeded to transplant (Figure 1). 48 patients who underwent therapy had next generation sequencing data for mutations of interest in AML. The most common mutations found in this cohort were ASXL1 (32), SRSF2 (20), RUNX1 (18), TET2 (17), IDH2 (16) and TP53 (12). No differences were found between patients that responded to first line therapy compared to those that did not, or those that responded to intensive chemotherapy compared to those responding to non-intensive treatment (Figure 2). Conclusion: Aza/Ven is an effective treatment regimen for AML-MRC/AML-MR, with 14/21 patients achieving CR/CRi after firstline treatment compared to 6/14 patients after IC. 4/4 patients achieved CR/CRi with salvage aza/ven after failing to respond to IC. Our study suggests that aza/ven should be considered as a firstline treatment option even in patients who are fit for intensive therapy as a means to achieve adequate responses to bridge to allogenic stem cell transplant without attendant toxicities associated with IC. Further studies are required to determine if specific mutations can predict response to either aza/ven or intensive treatment.

Decitabine in Combination with Aclacinomycin, Cytarabine and Granulocyte Colony-Simulating Factor (CAG) Had a High Response Rate in Children with Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes

Advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a rare disease in children with poor prognosis. Allogeneic transplantation is the only curative option. However, there has been no established treatment prior to transplant. We conducted a retrospective study exploring the response rates and safety of decitabine combined with aclacinomycin, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG) for induction treatment of advanced MDS and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (MDR-AML) in children. Patients from 1 to 14 years administrated in Pediatric Blood Disease Center of CAMS Blood Disease Hospital between January 1the 2019 and December 31th 2022 were screening. All diagnosed with MDS-EB or MDR-AML according to WHO 2016 criteria and treated with decitabine combined with CAG were identified. The efficacy of one-cycle treatment of MDS-ED was evaluated based on The International Working Group Response Criteria 2006. The response for MDR-AML was evaluated according to the criteria for AML published by ELN. The response of MDR-AML was defined as complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). The response of MDS-EB was defined as CR or bone marrow CR with hematological improvement (HI). A total of 13 patients, including MDS-EB (n=7) and MDR-AML (n=6), were enrolled for analysis. 5-day decitabine was administrated, combined with modified CAG regimen for 7 days. Eventually 12 patients of those were available for evaluation. For patients with MDS-EB, four achieved CR and three reached marrow CR with HI. Four patients with MDR-AML, three achieved CR and two reached CRi. The overall response rate was 100%(12/12). The most frequent adverse events were myelosuppression and suppression-induced infections, but no infection-related mortality was recorded. There had been no cardiotoxic event happened, either. Only one patient experienced fatal bleeding in early stage after treatment. The median follow-up time was 16 months (range 1-48). At last follow-up, 10 patients who had underwent allo-HCT were alive without disease. The remaining 2 patients died of disease progression. The 2-year estimated overall survival was 62.9%. Decitabine combined with modified CAG had a high response rate for children with advanced MDS and MDR-AMl, and it can bridge patients to curative allogeneic transplantation.

Subunit-Specific Analysis of Cohesin-Mutant Myeloid Malignancies Reveals Distinct Ontogeny and Outcomes

Introduction:Loss of function mutations in the cohesin complex ring components and modulators STAG2, RAD21, SMC1A, SMC3, and PDS5B are recurrent genetic drivers in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndromes. However, whether different cohesin subunit mutations share disease characteristics and prognostic impact is not well understood. Methods: We assembled a cohort of 4,439 patients with hematologic neoplasms at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and the Munich Leukemia Laboratory (MLL), and identified a subset of 790 cohesin-mutant patients, the largest cohesin-mutant cohort to date. We performed a retrospective analysis of the incidence, clinical presentation, genomic landscape, and clinical outcomes in a cohesin subunit-specific way. Results: STAG2 mutations were most common and present in 610 cases (diagnosed as MDS (50%), AML (36%), MDS/MPN (10%)), followed by RAD21 in 104 (20% MDS, 64% AML, 2% MDS/MPN), SMC3 in 26 (35% MDS, 42% AML, no MDS/MPN), SMC1A in 22 (27% MDS, 55% AML, 5% MDS/MPN), PDS5B in 16 (13% MDS, 38% AML and 6% MDS/MPN), and 12 cases with more than one mutated cohesin gene (50% MDS, 33% AML, 8% MDS/MPN). Within the DFCI cohort, 256 (82%) patients were diagnosed with a myeloid malignancy and 55 (18%) patients with a non-myeloid hematologic malignancy. We focused our subsequent analysis on 735 patients diagnosed with MDS, MDS/MPN or AML, and compared them to 3,649 cohesin-wildtype (WT) patients in the DFCI and MLL cohorts. We found that STAG2 mutations were acquired at the MDS stage and were associated with MDS with increased blasts (75% cases with MDS-IB1 or IB2) and secondary AML. We also noted their co-occurrence with secondary AML-type mutations, such as ASXL1 (64%, OR=5.5, FDR=5e-29), SRSF2 (45%, OR=7.4, FDR=5-e31) and RUNX1 (37%, OR=3.5, FDR=2e-13), and trisomy 8 (OR=10.6, FDR= 2.2e-50). In contrast, mutations in RAD21, SMC1A, SMC3 and PDS5B shared features with de novo AML, including co-occurrence with NPM1 (32%, OR 4.3, FDR=1e-6) and FLT3 (23%, OR= 2.8, FDR= 0.01), and association of RAD21 and SMC1A with t(8;21) AML (OR= 131;134; FDR= 3.8e-5;4.1e-19). Of note, both STAG2 and RAD21 mutations shared a mutational exclusivity with TP53 mutations (OR=0.04-0.06, FDR &amp;lt; 0.001, Figure 1A). We next assessed the impact of different cohesin mutations on clinical outcomes. We conducted independent analyses of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in MDS and AML. Given our observations that cohesin mutations were mutually exclusive with TP53 mutations, and the established prognostic impact of TP53 mutations, we compared the overall survival (OS) and AML-free survival (PFS) of patients with STAG2-mutant MDS (n=119) to TP53-mutant MDS (n=280) and cohesin/ TP53-WT MDS (n=1,023). With a median follow-up (FU) of 51.1 months we observed a significantly worse OS of STAG2-mutant MDS compared to cohesin and TP53-WT MDS (HR 1.44, CI= 1.10-1.89, p=0.007) and a similar risk of leukemic transformation as TP53-mutant MDS cases (median AML-PFS of 15.4 months for STAG2, and 12.1 months for TP53, p=0.3). Furthermore, STAG2-mutant AML (n=148) had significantly worse OS than AML without myelodysplasia related changes (MR) (n=1384) (HR= 0.62, 95% CI=0.5-0.76, p&amp;lt;0.001, median FU 42.8 months), and similar outcomes as AML-MR without TP53 mutations (n=567), (HR=1.25, 95% CI= 1.01-1.55, p=0.04). Importantly, this pattern was distinct from outcomes of RAD21-mutant AML (n=39), which was almost identical to AML-non-MR and significantly better than STAG2-mutant AML OS (HR= 0.56, 95% CI= 0.34-0.93, p=0.024) ( Figure 1B). The effects of STAG2 and RAD21 mutations on OS remained significant when censored for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Our findings suggest that only STAG2 mutations confer a negative impact on MDS and AML, and this is attributed to secondary ontogeny. Conclusions: In summary, our study establishes a role for different cohesin subunit mutations in distinct subtypes of MDS and AML, which has significant prognostic implications and expands our current understanding of this important group of driver genes. The findings from our subunit-specific analysis demonstrate that while STAG2 mutations are characterized by secondary AML ontogeny arising from MDS and associated with a worse prognosis, RAD21 mutations are associated with de novo AML and better survival.

Excellent Outcome Following Maintenance Therapy with Gilteritinib after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Even in Non-Remission Status

[Background] FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation has been shown to be a poor prognostic factor for recurrence and overall survival in AML. In recent years, various FLT3 inhibitors have been successively developed and reported to improve the prognosis of FLT3-mutated AML. However, relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT) remains high, and strategies to improve prognosis are desired. Clinical trials have been conducted using FLT3 inhibitors as maintenance therapy allo-HSCT to reduce the relapse rate and some efficacy has been reported, but real-world data on maintenance therapy with gilteritinib for FLT3-mutated AML after allo-HSCT are limited, especially after cord blood transplantation (CBT). [Objective and method] To assess the efficacy, safety, clinical features and outcome of gilteritinib maintenance after allo-HSCT for FLT3-mutated AML, we retrospectively analyzed patients underwent allo-HSCT, most of which are CBT for FLT3-mutated AML from April 2019 to October 2022. [Result] During the study period, 46 patients received allo-HSCT for FLT3-mutated AML in our institute. The median follow-up day of survivors was 649 (115-1149). The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 20-75). Twenty-seven patients had de novo AML, 16 had AML with myelodysplasia related changes, and 3 had therapy related AML. One had favorable karyotype, 37 had intermediate, and 6 had adverse. Thirty-six patients received myeloablative pretransplant conditionings (MAC), and 10 received reduced intensity conditionings (RIC). All but 9 were in in non-remission at HSCT. The majority, 40, had used unrelated cord blood, 3 did unrelated bone marrow, 2 did unrelated peripheral blood, and 1 did related peripheral blood as grafts. Twenty-eight patients received gilteritinib maintenance therapy after HSCT, whereas 18 did not. Between the 2 groups, the patient characteristics, AML status, and HSCT procedures were well balanced. At 2 years after HSCT, overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), relapse rate (RR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) of whole studied population were 65.0%, 56.3%, 27.0%, and 21.1%, respectively. Patients with gilteritinib maintenance showed significantly superior OS and DFS to those without gilteritinib maintenance (2-year OS; 84.2% vs 35.7%, P = 0.0030, 2-year DFS; 71.4% vs 30.4%, P = 0.0036)(Figure 1A, 1B). RR and NRM tended to be lower in patients with gilteritinib maintenance than those without (2-year RR; 41.4% vs 18.1%, P = 0.1350, 2-year NRM; 34.4% vs 11.9%, P = 0.0548). Even if in non-remission status at HSCT, 23 patients with gilteritinib maintenance showed excellent outcome with 2-year OS 81.6%, DFS 70.9%, RR 21.2%, and NRM13.9%. A subanalysis of the four groups by with or without gilteritinib maintenance and by pretreatment conditioning intensity showed that patients who received MAC and gilteritinib maintenance had the most superior 2-year OS 94.1%. [Conclusion] Our data indicated that following maintenance therapy with gilteritinib after allo-HSCT could overcome the poor prognosis of FLT3-mutated AML even for those in non-remission status, despite the profound chemo-resistant character of FLT3-mutated AML.

Significance of the Apoptotic Regulators BAX, BCL2, BCL- XL and MCL1 in Newly Diagnosed AML

Introduction: In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), cytogenetics and molecular mutations remain important prognostic tools for tailoring treatment after induction therapy. Abnormalities in multiple components of apoptotic pathways have been identified as potential drivers of AML. Identifying other biomarkers may help us further refine prognosis and identify other therapeutic strategies. B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2), Bcl-xL and myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl1) are commonly expressed prosurvival proteins in hematologic malignancies, whereas Bax acts as a promoter of apoptosis. We retrospectively evaluated the significance of Bax, Bcl2, Bcl-xL and Mcl1 expression in newly diagnosed AML patients using the Beat AML program 1. Methods: We analyzed RNA-expression data from The Beat AML study (672 tumor specimens collected from 562 patients) 1. Data was extracted from the public database. Different expression levels of the above genes were compared using t-tests. Results were considered significant with p-value &amp;lt; .05. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival. Results: For the correlative survival analyses, Bax, Bcl2, Bcl-xL and Mcl1 mRNA expression and clinical information were both obtained from the BeatAML cohort 1. Patients were categorized into high expressers (≥ median) and low expressers (&amp;lt;median). In total, 461 patients had available gene expression data. The mean age of diagnosis was 57 years, and 56.6% of patients were male. The most common specific diagnosis at inclusion was AML with mutated NPM1 (22%), followed by AML with myelodysplasia related changes (21%) and AML, NOS (11%). Complete response to induction was seen in more than half (56%) of the patients for which response was recorded (n=369). Others developed refractory AML (32%). No data was available for 12%. Standard chemotherapy (induction therapy with idarubicin and cytarabine (7+3) and consolidation therapy with high dose cytarabine) was used in 98.4% of these patients. Over half of the analyzed samples were peripheral blood (52%), and the remaining samples were either bone marrow aspirate (46%) or from leukapheresis (2%). Most of the specimens were collected at initial acute leukemia diagnosis (62.2%), others were collected with residual disease or post chemotherapy (25.1%). The mean survival for this cohort was 13.7 months. Above median expression of Mcl1 was associated with longer survival (33 vs. 20 months; p = 0.0262). Above median expression of Bax was also associated with longer survival (32 vs. 18.2 months; p = 0.0114). In the Bax analysis, gene expression was further subdivided into 4 quartiles which showed correlation of expression levels with length of survival (Figure 1). The prognostic significance of the ratio Bax/ (Mcl1+Bcl2+Bcl-xL) was also analyzed given the mechanism of action of these various regulators. A higher ratio was associated with longer survival (40.7 vs. 18.7 months; p = 0.0095) (Figure 2) Conclusions Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 are commonly expressed antiapoptotic proteins, whereas Bax is a promoter of apoptosis. The results with Bax are consistent with previous literature. Our results with Mcl1 expression differed from what we may have expected. This may be due to the sample size or methodology. However, it may also be due to the fact that a ratio of the actors is needed to help predict prognosis (as we analyzed in Figure 2). The overall survival between Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL was compared independently, however, they did not appear to have a significant difference in survival between high and low expression groups. We are currently working to see if this ratio can be validated in a prospective cohort of relapsed/ refractory AML patients treated on clinical trial and this data will be presented at the meeting. The Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax has demonstrated promising results in treating AML. However, venetoclax appears to have limited activity as a single agent. Our study suggests that potentially a combination of agents targeting factors such as Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 may be associated with improved survival in patients with AML. Further validation of these biomarkers is warranted, and Mcl-1 inhibitors are currently in clinical trials.

Real-World Outcomes with CPX-351 Induction in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction: CPX-351 is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine with a fixed molar ratio of 1:5. CPX-351 is approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed, therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia related changes (AML-MRC) in the U.S. and Europe for adult patients (pts) eligible for intensive chemotherapy. In a randomized phase 3 study of older pts ages 60-75, CPX-351 induction showed improved CR rates and OS compared to conventional 7+3 induction, with the greatest benefit seen in pts with t-AML and those without prior hypomethylating agent (HMA) use. There is limited data on the use of CPX-351 in younger pts, although the U.S. FDA approval was not age-restricted. This study examined real-world CPX-351 usage, including patient selection, clinical outcomes, and complications during induction hospitalizations. Methods: We identified previously untreated AML pts who received CPX-351 induction chemotherapy at the University of Kansas Medical Center via retrospective chart review from August 2017 - May 2023. Determination of t-AML and AML-MRC was made by patient history, bone marrow morphology, and available cytogenetic and molecular information at the time of therapy selection. We excluded pts who received CPX-351 as part of a clinical trial. Data was collected for baseline demographics, disease characteristics, outcomes, and safety profile. The composite complete remission rate (CRc) was defined as CR+CRi+CRh at recovery marrow after induction. Primary refractory disease included pts who failed to achieve CR, CRi, or CRh after 2 courses of intensive induction and excluded those who died in aplasia or due to an indeterminate cause. Results: 74 pts with previously untreated AML who received CPX-351 were identified. Median age was 64 years (21-78): 29% of pts were &amp;lt;60 years old, 50% were males, 84% were Non-Hispanic White, 32% had t-AML, 68% had AML-MRC, 20% had prior HMA treatment, and 22% had prior anthracycline exposure. ELN 2022 risk categories were 13% favorable, 20% intermediate, and 68% adverse. 21 pts had complex karyotype (28%), and 16% were TP53 mutant (Table 1). Indications for induction with CPX-351 versus 7+3 included history of prior chemotherapy (n=24), prior MDS (n=32), or MDS-related changes in bone marrow morphology (n=50). The CRc for the total study population was 61% (45/74). Of these, 29% (13/45) achieved MRD negativity by multiparameter flow cytometry &amp;lt;10 -4. CRc in the ELN adverse risk group was 54% (27/50), 73% (11/15) in the intermediate-risk group, and 78% (7/9) in the favorable risk group. Among TP53 mutant pts, CRc was 42% (5/12). CRc in the t-AML group was 71% (17/24), 56% (28/50) in the AML-MRC group, and 53% (8/15) in the prior HMA treatment group. The CRc in pts ≥60 was 63%, 15% were primary refractory, and 37% underwent alloSCT in CR1. In pts &amp;lt;60, the CRc was 54%, 32% were primary refractory, and 27% underwent an alloSCT in CR1 (Table 2). A second course of induction therapy was given for persistent disease at day 14 or similar time point in 36% (n=27) of pts. Among those, 55% (15/27) had primary refractory disease, 20% of the cohort. At a median follow-up of 11 mos, the mOS was 10.8 mos (0.4-54). The mOS for t-AML was 13 mos, whereas the mOS for the group with prior HMA treatment was 10.4 mos. For pts that achieved CR, mOS was 13.6 mos; for pts that achieved MRD negativity, mOS was 13.8 mos. The mOS for pts &amp;lt;60 was 16 mos, and for pts ≥60 was 10 mos (p=0.39). The mOS for pts that achieved CRc in the group &amp;lt;60 was 20.3mos, and for ≥60 was 11.2 mos (p=0.27). Pts that underwent alloSCT in CR1 &amp;lt;60 had mOS of 25 mos; for ≥60, it was 14.2 mos (p=0.37). During induction hospitalization, febrile neutropenia was the most common adverse event in 84% (n=62). ICU treatment was required in 14% (N=5). There were 2 deaths during induction: one due to respiratory failure and one attributed to sepsis. Conclusion: The use of CPX-351 demonstrated efficacy across subgroups, especially in t-AML and pts without prior HMA exposure, as shown in larger studies. In pts &amp;lt;60 years, even though CRc rates were lower, CPX-351 led to longer mOS in those who achieved CRc and in those who underwent alloSCT compared to pts ≥60 years, although it didn't reach statistical significance in this small cohort. Induction therapy outcomes and treatment-related complications in our study corroborate the data for prior CPX-351 studies.

Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Ameliorates Ineffective Hematopoiesis of Myelodysplasia Syndrome (MDS)

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) is a gallate ester obtained by condensation of gallic acid with the (3R)-hydroxy group of (-)-epigallocatechin, extracted from green tea, exhibiting beneficial effects as an apoptosis and cell differentiation inducer helping counteract uncontrolled proliferation and impaired differentiation characteristic of leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphoid leukemia, low grade B-lymphomas and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes were carried out showing positive results. This study aimed to evaluate the in vivo effect of EGCG in a mice model of myelodysplastic syndrome (NHD13 mice). B6.SJL-PtprcaPep3b/BoyJ mice (PepBoy) received 9,5Gy irradiation followed by transplantation of bone marrow cells from NUP98-HOXD13 mice by i.v. caudal vein injection; disease establishment was confirmed at day 15 by blood cytopenia. To assess the EGCG effects on MDS, 10-week-old female NUP98-HOXD13 mice (NHD13 +) and their littermate WT mice (NHD13 -) were treated for 4 weeks with EGCG (50mg/Kg/day 5x/week i.p.) or vehicle. The animals were then sacrificed, and bone marrow and spleen were obtained for flow cytometry and histology analyses. Automated hematological counts and clinical biochemistry parameter analysis were done. After signing the written informed consent, a 71-year-old man diagnosed with high-risk MDS, with 9% blasts in the bone marrow, underwent a daily oral 800mg EGCG treatment. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of University of Campinas and by the National Research Ethics Committee ( CAAE: 40656720.5.0000.5404). During this period, the patient underwent weekly clinical assessments and laboratory studies to monitor any potential toxicity. Peripheral blood samples were obtained before and after treatment to observe any alteration in cell counts and immune cell composition. Before treatment, NDH13 + exhibited a reduction in number of leukocytes, platelets, and hemoglobin levels, in accordance with the literature. EGCG treatment ameliorated hematological parameters, showed by increased leukocyte numbers (monocytes and neutrophils) and platelets with no signals of liver and kidney toxicity detected by histology and serum biochemistry. Untreated mice showed increased osteoprogenitor, osteoblast and endothelial cells in the bone marrow, corroborating the literature. EGCG treatment did not alter the frequency of these cells, HSC or immature cells (CD34 + or CD117 +). However, EGCG induced extramedullary hematopoiesis in spleen and no changes in the percentage/frequency of Foxp3 + regulatory T cells (CD4 +CD25 + and/or CD4 +FOXP3 +). Additionally, the patient treated by ECGC for one month exhibited reduction of regulatory T cells CD4 +CD25 + and CD4 +FOXP3 +, and increased CD8 + T cells (CD3 +CD8 +) and natural killer cells (CD16 +CD56 +) accompanied by increased mature leukocytes (monocytes and neutrophils), with no changes in hemoglobin and platelet number. Our initial findings indicate that EGCG induces improved hematological parameters in MDS and might shift immune cells to a more cytotoxic phenotype. The extramedullary hematopoiesis observed in mice may be due to reduction of CXCR4 in bone marrow cells, as previously described by our group. In summary, EGCG might be a promising adjuvant in the treatment of MDS. Further research and clinical studies are warranted to validate and fully explore EGCG therapeutic benefits. Fig1a EGCG ameliorates NHD13 and transplanted mice hematological parameters. At the end of the EGCG treatment (50mg/kg/day i.p) or vehicle (Ctrl), NHD13 + and transplanted (PepBoy) mice were bled from the retro-orbital plexus. EGCG induced an increased the number of leukocytes ( A), monocytes ( B), neutrophils ( C) and the number of platelets ( D) using the CELL-DYN Emerald Hematology System counter. EGCG represented by the green column, and the vehicle by the gray color. Statistical significance ( Mann-Whitney test) is indicated; n=6 per group. Fig1b. EGCG improved the immune system of HR-SMD patient. A 71-years-old man with HR-SMD received EGCG treatment (800 mg/Kg/day) for 30 days. Peripheral blood counts were evaluated at day 0 and day 30. EGCG ameliorated hematological parameters - increased mature leukocytes (A) - monocytes (B) and neutrophils (C), with no changes in hemoglobin (D) and platelets

Real World Outcomes of CPX-351 Compared to Traditional Chemotherapy with Cytarabine Consolidation for Treatment of Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Introduction: Outcomes in patients with secondary AML (sAML) are inferior to those with de novo AML which has led investigators to seek alternatives to traditional treatment. Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine, or CPX-351, for the treatment of sAML has shown superior complete remission/complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CR/CRi), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) compared to the traditional non-liposomal formulations of daunorubicin and cytarabine (“7+3”). However, this agent was originally studied in combination with a suboptimal consolidation regimen which did not include standard of care high dose cytarabine (HiDAC). This is often cited as a limitation of the study and may have contributed to the significantly lower response rates reported when compared to historical data. Here we present a real-world comparison of the efficacy and safety of patients with sAML receiving CPX-351 versus traditional 7+3 with HiDAC consolidation. Methods: Patients were at least 18 years of age with sAML, defined as: t-AML, AML-with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes (MRC), or AML with a history of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Patients were included if they had received induction (and consolidation, if applicable) with CPX-351 or induction with 7+3 (daunorubicin 60 mg/m 2 for 3 days and cytarabine 100 mg/m 2 for 7 days), followed by consolidation with cytarabine (≥1000 mg/m 2 x 6 doses). Nominal data were analyzed using chi squared tests or Fisher's exact tests. Continuous data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A Kaplan Meier estimator was used for survival outcomes. Results: Overall, 58 patients with sAML were included, with 36 (62%) receiving CPX-351 and 22 (38%) receiving 7+3 followed by cytarabine-based consolidation between April 2013 and June 2022. Patients in the CPX-351 were older (67.5 vs 62 years, p=0.04) and had a higher prevalence of poor-risk cytogenetics (p=0.22). Other baseline characteristics were similar (Table 1). The rate of CR/CRi following induction was significantly higher in patients who received 7+3-based induction vs patients who received CPX-351 (81.8% vs 44.4%, p=0.01). Twenty-five percent of patients achieved CR/CRi in the CPX-351 arm with one induction cycle, compared to 95.5% in the 7+3 group. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 vs 6.1 months (p=0.67) and median OS was 18.3 vs 9.3 months (p=0.73) in the CPX-351 and 7+3 cohorts, respectively (Figure 1). Thirty-nine percent of patients in the 7+3 cohort proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant compared to 81% in the CPX-351 cohort, however median OS in patients who underwent transplant was similar between the two cohorts (16.8 vs 15.8 months). Median OS was longer in the CPX-351 cohort however this was not statistically significant (Figure 1). Rates of both febrile neutropenia (94.3% vs 95.5%; P&amp;gt;0.99) and confirmed infections (54.3% vs 50%) were similar amongst those treated with CPX-351 and 7+3. Bacteremia and pneumonia were the most common infections in both cohorts. Median duration of neutropenia was significantly longer in the CPX-351 cohort (43 days vs. 27 days, p=0.002) with no major difference in duration of thrombocytopenia. In the 7+3 cohort, 11 deaths were directly attributed to progression, while 5 were associated with infection. In the CPX-351 cohort, 6 deaths were directly attributed to progression, while 8 were attributed to infection. At day 60, two deaths were observed in the CPX-351 cohort and there were no deaths in the 7+3 cohort. Conclusion: These findings suggest use of traditional 7+3 induction followed by HiDAC consolidation may be an alternative to CPX-351 for patients with sAML. Although median PFS was longer in the 7+3 cohort, this did not translate into longer median OS, likely due to the low rate of patients proceeding to transplant. Similar rates of overall survival in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation support the hypothesis that transplant should be the goal for most patients with sAML. The retrospective nature of the study may limit broader application of this data.

Unraveling the Impact of 2022 Classifications on Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Assessing the True Qualification Power of Diagnostic Qualifiers

Background: In 2022, two new acute myeloid leukemia (AML) classifications (World Health Organization, WHO and International Consensus Classification, ICC) and a new edition of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) prognostic system have been released. These advances have been driven by the need to incorporate molecular characterization into the diagnosis and management of AML. Although important similarities in the diagnostic classifications have been recently recognized by diverse validation studies, the different approach to define AML ontogenesis (primary vs secondary) remains a central issue of the classification discrepancy. While for the WHO 2022 a prior diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is sufficient to define AML myelodysplasia-related (MR), the ICC no longer recognizes the AML arising from MDS (sAML) as a disease entity, and instead introduces a list of “diagnostic qualifiers”, also including therapy-related AML (tAML). Nevertheless, whether these “diagnostic qualifiers” represent a mere “descriptive” information or impact on prognosis and outcome is not well defined. Methods: We studied a cohort of 936 AML patients collected through a multicenter international collaboration across 5 academic centers. An integration of clinical and cytogenetic/molecular data was used to apply the WHO 2016, WHO 2022 and ICC diagnostic classifications and the 2017 and 2022 edition of ELN prognostic risk stratification criteria. Results: Overall,220 cases were classified as secondary AML (155 sAML and 65 tAML). As per the2016 and 2022 WHO editions, the majority of sAML cases, accounting for 98.1% and 95.5% respectively, fell into the myelodysplasia-related changes (MRC) AML and AML-MR categories due to the “disease defining” presence of an antecedent MDS or MDS/MPN. According to the ICC, 81.9% of sAML cases were defined by the presence of a MDS-related genetic profile, belonging to AML with mutated TP53 (AML- TP53) and AML with MDS-related gene mutations (AML-MDSgene) and cytogenetic abnormalities (AML-MDSk) subcategories. The tAML group showed a greater diagnostic heterogeneity, with a higher frequency of KMT2A-related categories (10.8% and 7.7% according to WHO 2022 and ICC, respectively) and AML- TP53 for the ICC (21.5%, Fig. 1A). In terms of outcomes, according to the ELN 2022 risk classification the sAML and tAML groups were classified into favorable risk 5.8% and 13.9%, intermediate 12.3% and 36.9%, and adverse 81.9% and 49.2%, respectively. Notably, while the ELN 2022 edition was effective in stratifying the group of tAML patients receiving conventional treatment (p=0.002), no statistically significant differences were noticed when sAML patients were stratified based on the same ELN 2022 risk categories ( Fig. 1B). We then compared our sAML cohort to AML cases with ICC MDS-related profile not fulfilling the anamnestic criterion of a prior MDS diagnosis (233 cases, 32.54% - AML- TP53/MDSgene/MDSk subcategories), in terms of molecular characteristics and outcome. Remarkably, both groups showed a similar prevalence of MDS genes, except for RUNX1, which was more frequent in the AML cases with the ICC MDS-related profile (14%) than in sAML (6.3%, p =0.034). Finally, both groups showed similar outcomes. Conclusions: Here, we demonstrated the overarching importance of the biological ontogenetic profile in AML (&amp;gt;80% of sAML presented an MDS-related profile) and of the risk stratification according to the new classifications (&amp;gt;80% of sAML belonged to adverse ELN 2022 risk). As to outcomes, 2022 ELN edition confirmed its stratification capability for tAML, while sAML were not adequately stratified. This evidence supports the idea that therapy-related AML should be acknowledged and classified as “second” neoplasms, rather than being categorized as secondary AML. Considering the overlap in AML of MDS-related profile regardless of the presence of an antecedent diagnosis of MDS as “diagnostic qualifier”, these cases could potentially benefit from treatments specifically tailored for MDS-related conditions or those typically reserved for secondary AML, such as CPX-351.

CUX1mut Acute Myeloid Leukemia As a Distinct Biological Entity: An Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Implications

1. Introduction CUX1 is a tumor suppressor gene located on the long arm of chromosome 7. CUX1 mutations induce apoptosis evasion and are more commonly seen in therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. It is frequently mutated in myelodysplastic syndrome and less frequently in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical investigations are ongoing to explore therapeutic approaches in CUX1-deficient leukemia cell lines. However, data on the clinical outcomes of patients with AML and mutated CUX1 are sparse. We aimed to characterize the biological and clinical outcomes of CUX1 mut AML. 2. Methods We analyzed next-generation sequencing from 318 patients in the Project ERIS database with newly diagnosed AML treated from January 1, 2013 to April 18, 2023 at VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center. We identified 12 patients with CUX1 mut AML and compared them to a cohort of 306 CUX1 wild-type historical controls. We recorded baseline patient-related and disease characteristics, including age, ECOG, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores, molecular profiling and ELN 2022 cytogenetic risk, dates of regimen initiation, and survival. We used the D'Agostino &amp; Pearson method for normality testing and the t-test or Mann-Whitney (as applicable) tests for between-group comparisons. Categorical comparisons used Fischer's exact test. We applied the Bonferroni correction if multiple comparisons were made. The Wilson-Brown method was used for 95% confidence intervals. We analyzed survival by the Kaplan-Meier method with significance determined by the log-rank test. The event for calculating the overall survival (OS) was the date of death. Patients were otherwise censored at the date of last contact. 3. Results CUX1 mutations are found at a frequency of 3.9% (95% CI, 2.2-6.5) in AML. The median variant allele frequency of CUX1 mutations was 40.3% (range: 3.8-48.7), consistent with a heterozygous presentation. The median age at diagnosis of patients with CUX1 mut who received any anti-leukemic therapy was 57 years (range: 30-78 years), which was not significantly different from CUX1 wt at 65 years (range: 19-88, p = 0.312). Thirty-three (95% CI, 13.8-60.9) percent of patients had AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) on the initial diagnostic bone marrow biopsy, compared with 29.2% (95% CI, 24.2-34.7, p=0.752) for CUX1 wt. CUX1 mut AML was found in cytogenetically normal specimens at a frequency of 30.0% compared with 49.3% for CUX1 wt (p = 0.337). The most frequent cytogenetic abnormality in CUX1 mut AML was -7 (20.0%), followed by +8 (10.0%) and complex cytogenetics (10.0%). The most frequent cooperating molecular lesions were RUNX1, SRSF2, STAG2, FLT3-ITD, and NRAS (25.0% each). Patients with CUX1 mutations were nonsignificantly more likely to have ELN 2022 adverse-risk disease (odds ratio: 2.013, p = 0.379). In patients treated with intensive cytarabine-based inductions, the median overall survival was 26.3 months in the CUX1 mut group and 17.6 months in the CUX1 wt cohort, which was not significantly different (p = 0.501). Two patients with CUX1 mut AML were treated with first-line venetoclax and a hypomethylating agent. The overall survival was 12.7 months in one patient and not reached at a follow-up time of 20.2 months in the second. 4. Discussion While definitive conclusions are limited by the rarity of the mutation, mutations in CUX1 are heterozygous and appear to be non-significantly more frequently associated with myelodysplastic-related changes and secondary-type mutations. These findings may explain a higher proportion of patients harboring CUX1 mutations that have ELN 2022 adverse-risk disease. While we did not detect any significant survival differences between patients with and without CUX1 mutations, larger cohorts are needed to confirm the prognostic impact of these rare mutations in AML.

Long-Term Real-World Experience of CPX-351 in Combined French-Italian Cohorts Identified High Rate of Negative Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) and Prolonged Overall Survival

Introduction CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin packaged at a 5:1 molar ratio. This drug has been approved by the FDA and EMEA for patients with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (MRC-AML) according to the WHO 2016 AML classification. Real world experience from several countries (France, Italy, Germany, UK and US) showed similar results of phase 3 clinical registration but with short follow-up. Lancet et al. published a long-term update of phase 3 clinical trial and confirmed long-term remission and improvement of overall survival (OS) ( Lancet Haematology 2021). Thus, the primary objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of CPX-351 in a real-life setting with a longer follow-up, evaluating the impact of measurable residual disease (MRD) in responding patients. Methods We retrospectively collected data from patients treated with CPX-351 in thirty-six centers in France and Italy. Overall response rate (ORR) was defined by complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi). Among the patients in CR or CRi, 62 (61%) had MRD evaluation assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) or flow cytometry. OS was calculated from the date of AML diagnosis to the date of death or last follow-up. All statistical analysis were performed using SPSS v.22 software (IBM SPSS Statistics). Results Between April 2018 and October 2019, 170 patients treated with CPX-351 were included in this study. The sex ratio male/female was 80/90 and the median age was 66 years (range 20-83). AML subtypes were MRC-AML in 117 (69%) and t-AML 48 (28%) patients. According to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 classification, genetic risk was favorable, intermediate, and adverse in 8 (5%), 61 (36%), and 98 (58%) (missing for 3 patients), respectively. According to the ELN 2022 classification, genetic risk was favorable, intermediate, and adverse in 8 (5%), 16 (9%) and 143 (84%), respectively. Thirty percent and 19% of patients had complex and monosomal karyotypes, respectively. Assessed by NGS the most frequent mutated genes were: TP53 (n=35, 21%), RUNX1 (n=30, 18%), ASXL1 (n=22, 13%) and TET2 (n=18, 11%) among the XX were NGS was available (sinon ca fait des % qui ne tombe pas juste sur les 170 pts). According to a genetic ontogeny-based classifier (Lindsley et al., Blood 2015), 28 %, 39% and 33% had de novo/pan-AML, secondary type mutations AML, and TP53 mutated AML, respectively. The ORR was 102/170 (60%) after one (n=91) or two (n=11) inductions including 53% CR and 6% CRi. Among the 102 CR/CRi patients, 62 (61%) were evaluable for MRD after induction or after first consolidation. Forty (65%) patients had MRD below the threshold of 10 -3. ELN2017 and ELN2022 were identified as factors predicting CR/CRi rate ( P=0.032 and P=0.043, respectivelyà but the Lindsley classifier did not predict response ( P= 0.060). After 3-years of follow-up, in a univariate analysis, only MRD &amp;gt;10 -3 ( P=0.031); ELN 2017 classification ( P=0.027) and presence of TP53 mutation ( P=0.017) but not ELN 2022 or the Lindsley classifier; were associated with a significantly poorer median OS. In a multivariate analysis, only MRD &amp;gt;10 -3 was associated with a poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.5, P=0.013). Median OS was 40.9 months vs. 10.6 months for patients with MRD &amp;lt;10 -3 vs. ≥10 -3, respectively ( P=0.006). Sixty (35%) patients underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) with an improved median OS compared to non-transplanted patients (not-reached vs. 9.1 months, P&amp;lt;0.0001). We also observed a trend towards a better median OS in transplanted patients who underwent an HSCT with MRD &amp;lt;10 -3 (not reached vs. 26.0 months, P=0.06). Conclusion After 3 years of follow-up, the improved OS with CPX-351 was confirmed in the real- life setting. Achievement of MRD negativity contributed to improvement of OS in the overall population and, maybe, in transplanted patients. These data provide the rationale for the ongoing ALFA-2101 phase III clinical trial evaluating CPX-351 vs. 3+7 (daunorubicin and cytarabine) in non-MRC-AML and non-t-AML using MRD as the primary endpoint.

Daunorubicin/Cytarabine Liposome +/- Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin for Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed, Low-Intermediate Risk, FLT3-Wild Type, AML: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Liposomal-encapsulated cytarabine and daunorubicin (CPX-351 or Vyxeos) has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the treatment of newly diagnosed therapy-related AML (tAML) and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRCs). This was based on results of a phase III study conducted in patients with secondary AML (Lancet JE et al. JCO 2018). Despite data that highlighted the advantage of CPX-351 for sAML, it is intuitively likely that this powerful drug is also suitable for non-sAML. The mechanism of action is applicable for every AML. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of CPX-351 for patients with de novo low/ intermediate risk, FLT3-negative AML. While a definitive phase III study is planned, herein is described the pilot forerunner study. Methods: This pilot multi-center study is planned to recruit 20 patients, ages 18-70 years, with low-intermediate risk FLT3-negative AML. Induction therapy is with CPX-351 on days 1,3,5. One dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) can be added on day 1, at the discretion of the treating physician. Re-induction with CPX-351 on day 1,3 is permitted based on the results of day 14 bone marrow examination and at the discretion of the treating physician. Post-induction therapy followed the practice of the participating institutions. The primary endpoint was response rate. A key secondary endpoint was MRD evaluation, after induction, by multi-parameter flow cytometry with a threshold of 0.1%. As the initial genetic evaluation at diagnosis takes time, it was assumed upfront that an adverse risk may only become apparent in some patients with AML after initiation of therapy. Such subjects would ultimately be excluded from the study analysis. Results: Between August 2022 and June 2023, 20 patients were recruited and received the CPX-351 but 4 were finally diagnosed as high-risk and were excluded. The median age of the 15 patients that were included in the analysis was 56 years (range: 21-70), 53.3% were females. Eight of 15 patients (53.3%) were categorized as intermediate risk, according to the 2016 ELN guidelines, and 46.6% as favorable. Four patients (26.6%) received GO in addition to the CPX-351. None of the patients needed to receive re-induction. 100% of the patients achieved CR. Five of 13 evaluable patients (38.4%) achieved MRD-negativity post induction. No unfamiliar or severe adverse events were reported, even among patients who received GO. One patient died from sepsis after hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median time from day 1 of treatment to neutrophil recovery (ANC≥500/µL) and platelet recovery (≥50,000/µL) was 29 and 24 days, respectively, for the entire cohort and 27 and 24 days, respectively, for those who also received GO. Discussion: The hallmark of this study is reflected by the focus on patients with the low and intermediate-risk AML and not tAML and AML-MRCs, as was approved by the FDA. It includes also young patients (≥18 years), and not only those≥ 60 years. In addition, the CPX-351 was only given as induction therapy (with an option for re-induction) but not after achieving CR. The combination of CPX-351 with GO, although not previously reported, was based on current practice of adding GO to standard induction in some patients, allowing for a realistic future true comparator with standard 7+3 induction. In addition, MRD assessment post induction with CPX-351 has not been previously reported. The CR rate was 100% and the MRD results were a basis for subsequent studies. Finally, this is a pilot study that precedes a definitive planned phase III study that will compare standard induction with 7+3 versus CPX-351, with post-induction MRD monitoring and GO optional in both arms. Such a study may ultimately lead to a paradigm shift in the initial induction therapy of non-adverse risk patients with AML.